Topics & Articles

Home

Culture

Ethnic Groups

History

Issues

Links

Viet Nam



Search

or Browse the Archives

or Gets Posts by Tags



Most Popular Books on Asian-Nation

Miscellaneous

All posts copyright © 2001- by C.N. Le.
Some rights reserved. Creative Commons License

The views and opinions expressed on this site and blog posts (excluding comments on blog posts left by others) are entirely my own and do not represent those of any employer or organization with whom I am currently or previously have been associated.

Blog powered by WordPress


Behind the Headlines: APA News Blog

Academic Version: Applying my personal experiences and academic research as a professor of Sociology and Asian American Studies to provide a more complete understanding of political, economic, and cultural issues and current events related to American race relations, and Asia/Asian America in particular.

Plain English: Trying to put my Ph.D. to good use.

November 5, 2005

Written by C.N.

Viet Nam’s Anti-Corruption Chief Arrested

Those of you who have visited Viet Nam any time in the last couple of decades (and probably even before that) should know that corruption on the part of government officials throughout the country is rampant. It’s an open secret that the way to get things done is through bribes and that starts the minute you arrive in their airports — if you want to sail through customs quickly, slip a $10 spot into your passport as you give it to the clerk.

At any rate, Viet Nam was supposedly trying to address this rampant corruption and one high profile step was to name an official “anti-corruption” chief whose job was to lead efforts to reduce corruption in the country. Alas, the irony is inescapable — Yahoo News reports that this anti-corruption chief has just been arrested for allegedly taking bribes and other forms of graft:

Vietnam’s anti-corruption chief [Luong Cao Khai] has been arrested over allegations he took bribes and abused his position, in an embarrassing setback for the country’s fight against rampant graft. . . . , “He is accused of receiving money and land from some oil and gas officials to use for private purposes and abusing his position to provide his relatives with jobs in oil and gas sector,” the Tuoi Tre daily newspaper said Friday.

The communist regime has vowed to stamp out rampant corruption that permeates the government and state sector, and the National assembly is due to vote a comprehensive anti-corruption law on November 28. Critics, however, say the crackdown is highly selective and that some high-ranking officials have acquired de facto immunity from prosecution despite allegations that their personal fortunes were acquired illegally.

More proof that corruption is still alive and well and not going anywhere in Viet Nam. Corruption is not limited to communist countries of course, but the Vietnamese government seems to be doing all they can to showcase their own unique version of it. Very well done . . .

November 3, 2005

Written by C.N.

More Allegations of Racial Profiling

There were two stories in the news recently that involved allegations of racial profiling against Asians and other people of color. One involved a Black professor of Africana Studies at San Francisco State University who was stopped — and eventually arrested — by two campus security officers while he was trying to retrieve a book from his office:

Antwi Akom says he was just going to his office late on the night of October 25 to pick up a book he needed to prepare for class the next day. But after he was stopped by security guards at San Francisco State University, he ended up facing felony charges of resisting arrest and battery of a police officer. Akom, an assistant professor of Africana studies, was briefly jailed.

He has told supporters that he had an identification card and was willing to show it to the guards. Security officials have said that they did ask for the ID. The security report said he did not comply with reasonable requests. Akom’s supporters said that he repeatedly told the officers he was a professor and that he was in a rush because he had young children asleep in the car he drove to campus.

The incident has prompted a wave of meetings and demands for reform at San Francisco State. Professors say that Akom was a victim of racial profiling and that black employees routinely face harassment. The controversy is particularly upsetting to some professors, who say that they have taken pride in San Francisco State’s progressive reputation.

The second involved a small group of Muslim Americans who were detained and then carefully watched after they prayed at a recent NY Giants football game:

The Muslims said they did not know they were in a sensitive area, and they complained that they were subjected to racial profiling while they were praying, as their faith requires five times a day. “I’m as American as apple pie and I’m sitting there and now I’m made to feel like I’m an outsider, for no reason other than I have a long beard or that I prayed,” said Sami Shaban, a 27-year-old Seton Hall Law School student who lives in Piscataway.

Shaban said he and four friends had just gotten to the September 19 New York Giants-New Orleans Saints game when they left their seats to pray. Around halftime, 10 security officers and three state troopers approached the men and told them to come with them, Shaban said. The men were questioned and then were not allowed to return to their seats, but were instead assigned to seats in another section, Shaban said. Three guards stood near them, and escorted them to their cars when they left the stadium, he said.

As with most incidents, there are two sides to each story and conceivably, there may have been legitimate reasons why these two people of color were stopped, questioned, detained, and in the case of the Africana Studies professor, arrested.

But ultimately, these two incidents inevitably highlight the continuing issue of how people of color are still — even in 21st century globalized American society — constantly being questioned and challenged on their status as “real” or “authentic” Americans and whether their actions are considered “appropriate” by people in positions of power and authority, who in most cases, are White.

In other words, it is clear that the White-dominated social institutions and power structures of this country are still clinging on to the firmly-ingrained presumption that the only people who merit the identity of being “American,” and therefore who get to enjoy the direct and indirect privileges of that identity, are White (and perhaps even more specifically, male, upper class, and Protestant). Everyone else who does not fit into this category, apparently including professors working the birthplace of ethnic studies, are automatically seen as potential criminals.

Even when we as a nation and society are in a heightened state of awareness due to possible terrorist attacks, presuming that someone or a group of people are potential enemies based almost entirely on their racial/ethnic/national origin identity is the very definition of racial privilege and racial profiling. In other words, it is flat-out racist, unjust, and wrong.

American citizens theoretically enjoy certain freedoms from invasion of privacy and false searches and imprisonment by authorities. But unfortunately, those rights are apparently only valid if one is White.

November 2, 2005

Written by C.N.

Popularity of Samurai Movies

USA Today has an article that talks about the emerging — or enduring — popularity of samurai films among American consumers and in influencing Hollywood movies:

A subset of the martial arts genre, samurai films have been made since the early 1930s in Japan. They gained international status when renowned directors such as Kurosawa (Rashomon) explored the genre. Interest in Japanese pop culture and easy access to the films on DVD is driving the resurgence.

“It seems they’re just now, at the dawn of the 21st century, finally receiving the mainstream appreciation in the U.S. that is their due,” says Patrick Galloway, author of Stray Dogs & Lone Wolves: The Samurai Film Handbook. . . .

Swordplay is only part of the attraction of samurai films. “What you have in a samurai battle is close-in, bladed warfare, the good guy going against the bad guy face to face,” Jeck says. “You have kinetic energy, balletic grace and brutal force, all conjoined.” A foreign cousin of the American Western, samurai films “have struck a chord with U.S. audiences,” IFC’s George Lentz says.

I’ve talked before about how the popularity of certain Asian cultural elements can be both good and bad. It’s good when it introduces people to parts of Asian culture that had been in obscurity until then and fosters an appreciation and respect for those cultural elements. It’s bad when it reinforces and perpetuates negative stereotypes and biased portrayals of Asian culture.

Some Asian Americans may also object because they feel that American filmmakers are merely “copying” or “butchering” the original Asian elements for their own gain. Others see this type of cross-cultural influence as healthy and a sign of respect for the original Asian works. Like most things, there isn’t a simple answer, just general principles that need to be considered.

Each work will be judged separately — like Steven Spielberg’s upcoming release of Memoirs of a Geisha.

November 1, 2005

Written by C.N.

U.S.’s Plans for China’s Economy

The New York Times has an article that describes a series of proposals that U.S. government officials will present China on how it can modernize its economy, with the goal of strengthening China’s yuan currency and eventually equalizing China’s current trade imbalance with the U.S.:

The plan, to be discussed in two days of talks here and in Beijing, calls for China to speed up the privatization of state-owned companies, including banks; to develop a Chicago-style futures market for currency trading; to establish an independent credit-rating agency; and to crack down on bailouts for banks left holding bad loans. . . .

Though many of the ideas are familiar, and often supported by Chinese leaders in principle, the list reflects an increased effort to lecture China about internal financial issues. That could backfire. Chinese leaders invariably bristle at pressure from American officials, and they could view the new American “priorities” as an unwelcome intrusion.

Beyond the actual financial details of the plan, I find the larger socio-political context of the U.S.’s efforts to influence China’s economy very interesting. Specifically, the question is, is the U.S. being a little presumptuous and maybe even a little arrogant to think that it can tell China how to run its own economy? How would the U.S. feel if China came out with a list of suggestions on how the U.S. can improve its economy?

Although the U.S. may have some legitimate concerns with some of China’s financial practices, it seems to me that the U.S. is in danger of engaging in another form of imperialism. In the past — long ago and recently — the U.S. used military means to spread its power and influence. Nowadays, they are apparently turning toward financial and political means to try to accomplish the same thing — influence the internal affairs of a sovereign country.

We’ve seen how “successful” these attempts at imperialism have been (i.e., Viet Nam, the current war in Iraq, etc.). In this case, China is not Viet Nam or Iraq — it is a major international political, economic, and military superpower, just like the U.S. In other words, the U.S. had better watch its steps here.